View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
goldeneye343
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep Sat 18, 2004 9:39 am Post subject: xbox only ughhhhhhhhh
|
|
|
i was hoping for 1 on game cube and or all 3 but not just 1 i guess i better find a good racer and look for ward to other better companies like ea to do racers
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goldeneye343
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep Sat 18, 2004 9:42 am Post subject: concerning games
|
|
|
ok i hope you all do not do the same as they did with burnout 3 EA: we canceled it because nintendos lack of online support ) how pathetic if goldeneye gets cancele im really going to be *#% same for top gear games
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuantumFusion
Guest
|
Posted: Sep Sun 19, 2004 9:30 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hmmm... most 3rd party games selll like garbage on GC, so of course they arent going to come to the system.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goldeneye343
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 26
|
Posted: Feb Sat 19, 2005 8:55 am Post subject: ok
|
|
|
you are wrong there are alot of games on the gc that r third party that sel well on gc burnout was one of them so go and read some more
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuantumFusion
Guest
|
Posted: Feb Sat 26, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: Re: ok
|
|
|
goldeneye343 wrote: |
you are wrong there are alot of games on the gc that r third party that sel well on gc burnout was one of them so go and read some more |
Ok, so why didn't Burnout 3 come to GC?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goldeneye343
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 26
|
Posted: Mar Thu 03, 2005 10:14 am Post subject: because
|
|
|
because ea was a retard they didnt want burn out three on gc bc the gc dont support online not because burnout didnt sell well on gc so theres your answer and let me guess your going to say no its bc its sales if so youd be wrong
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuantumFusion
Guest
|
Posted: Mar Mon 07, 2005 10:03 am Post subject: Re: because
|
|
|
goldeneye343 wrote: |
because ea was a retard they didnt want burn out three on gc bc the gc dont support online not because burnout didnt sell well on gc so theres your answer and let me guess your going to say no its bc its sales if so youd be wrong |
Online play is one of the reasons kid...doesnt it suck that 3rd parties are leaving just because of online play? Whats also sad is that the online play in BO3 is completly minor, the single player is where you play it the most to unlock all vehicles and such.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Coarse Limely
Joined: 07 Nov 2002
Posts: 70
Location: Drapes
|
Posted: Mar Mon 07, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Yeah, it does suck. It's such a boring concept in cases like Burnout 3 where, as you said, online play is only a minor component. "Online" is just the current buzz-word, like "megapixels" and "paradigm" and the like. It may be cool for some games, but there's no reason why one's game needs to have "Online!" on the box in order for it to be released.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuantumFusion
Guest
|
Posted: Mar Mon 07, 2005 11:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Coarse Limely wrote: |
Yeah, it does suck. It's such a boring concept in cases like Burnout 3 where, as you said, online play is only a minor component. "Online" is just the current buzz-word, like "megapixels" and "paradigm" and the like. It may be cool for some games, but there's no reason why one's game needs to have "Online!" on the box in order for it to be released. |
I disagree... I think online play is the future of gaming, but great single player games should have their place too. Having an online enabled game is one of the best features of a game, and I would buy a Live enabled game easly over one that wasnt. I love being able to download new missions, maps, weapons and vehicles for single player and online games... I love having built in Scoreboards for single player, as welll as multiplayer. I love being able to get friend invites while playing Halo 2 single player, or Fable. Its awesome being connnected 24/7.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FyreWulff
Guest
|
Posted: Mar Fri 18, 2005 12:25 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Burnout 1 and 2 sold way more on GameCube than they did on Xbox. The "online-centric" of Burnout 3 is a complete joke and a lame excuse for not bringing it to GameCube. I owned 1 & 2 for my GameCube and only bought 3 on Xbox because it wasn't coming for GameCube. Soon, I found out that the online is HORRIBLE. EA is completely incapable of making an online game without a horrible interface, horrible GUIs, bad matchfinding, etc. Heck, I have NFSU2 for my Xbox aswell, and I don't play that online even though I have Live. It's just that bad.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuantumFusion
Guest
|
Posted: Mar Fri 18, 2005 9:12 am Post subject:
|
|
|
FyreWulff wrote: |
Burnout 1 and 2 sold way more on GameCube than they did on Xbox. The "online-centric" of Burnout 3 is a complete joke and a lame excuse for not bringing it to GameCube. I owned 1 & 2 for my GameCube and only bought 3 on Xbox because it wasn't coming for GameCube. Soon, I found out that the online is HORRIBLE. EA is completely incapable of making an online game without a horrible interface, horrible GUIs, bad matchfinding, etc. Heck, I have NFSU2 for my Xbox aswell, and I don't play that online even though I have Live. It's just that bad. |
Of course they did, at that time thats bascially all the racers GC had. Xbox had... well lets just say ALOT MORE No....... not bringing Burnout 3 to GC was a great idea, it saves EA money. They wanted to make the game online and make that mode a viable reason to buy the game. With GC that reason is gone. Nintendo's choice to not go online is just losing it more and more 3rd party support, among other things.
Wait... if you owned an Xbox why do you even care about Bo3 on GC? lol... or even about BO1 and BO2 on GC? (Maybe you didnt have a Xbox when those games come out, I dont know)
The online for BO3 was horrible....... at first EA patched it up and its alot better now. As for NFSU2 its alot better then BO3 online.......... EA learned somewhat.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|